{"id":2420,"date":"2018-06-04T15:04:44","date_gmt":"2018-06-04T12:04:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journal.phaselis.org\/uncategorized\/pha-0069"},"modified":"2018-06-27T15:04:30","modified_gmt":"2018-06-27T12:04:30","slug":"pha-0069","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/journal.phaselis.org\/en\/2018-en\/pha-0069","title":{"rendered":"M\u00d6 425 – 300 Y\u0131llar\u0131 Aras\u0131nda Rhodos’un Do\u011fu Akdeniz Ekonomisindeki Etkisi ve Adan\u0131n Siyasi Yap\u0131s\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Impact of Rhodes Over the Economy of Eastern Mediterranean Sea and Her Political Structure (425-300 BC)<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Muzaffer DEM\u0130R
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

PHASELIS<\/em> IV (2018) 161-175<\/strong>
\nDOI<\/strong>: 10.18367\/Pha.18010<\/a>
\nReceived Date<\/strong>: 21.03.2018 \u00a0 | Acceptance Date<\/strong>: 16.05.2018
\nOnline Publication Date<\/strong>: 04.06.2018
\nCopyright \u00a9 PHASELIS Journal of Interdisciplinary Mediterranean Studies, 2018<\/p>\n

<\/div><\/div>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t\n

\"pdf\"\u00a0 Get PDF<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\"references\"\u00a0<\/strong> View PDF<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\"info\"<\/a>\u00a0 References<\/a><\/b><\/p>\n\n\t\t

<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>
<\/div>\n

\u00d6z:<\/strong> Rhodos, erken d\u00f6nemlerden itibaren g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bir askeri donanmaya ve deniz ticaretiyle u\u011fra\u015fan t\u00fcccar s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131na sahip ola gelmi\u015ftir. Rhodos \u00f6zellikle do\u011fuya do\u011fru G\u00fcney Anadolu sahilleri ve Levant \u00fczerinden M\u0131s\u0131r\u2019a, bat\u0131ya do\u011fru Kiklad adalar\u0131 ve kent devletleri, kuzeye do\u011fru K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck Asya k\u0131y\u0131 adalar\u0131 ve kent devletleri ve Karadeniz\u2019e kadar uzanan \u00f6zellikle hububat ticaret yollar\u0131 \u00fczerinde merkezi bir stratejik konumu elinde tutmu\u015ftur. Bu durum adan\u0131n liman gelirlerine ve refah seviyesine yans\u0131m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. G\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc oldu\u011fu VIII. y\u00fczy\u0131l\u0131n ilk yar\u0131s\u0131 ve III. y\u00fczy\u0131l\u0131n sonlar\u0131nda b\u00f6lgesinde deniz g\u00fcvenli\u011fini, h\u00e2kimiyetini ve ticaretini elinde tutabilmi\u015ftir. Ancak Klasik D\u00f6nem V. y\u00fczy\u0131lda Persler, Spartal\u0131lar ve Atinal\u0131lar gibi b\u00f6lgenin b\u00fcy\u00fck g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc devletleri aras\u0131nda denge politikalar\u0131 saye\u00adsinde ayakta kalmay\u0131 ba\u015farm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Rhodos\u2019un \u00f6zellikle IV. y\u00fczy\u0131lda kendi i\u00e7inden de destek alan bu b\u00fcy\u00fck g\u00fc\u00e7le\u00adrin etkisi alt\u0131nda s\u0131k s\u0131k taraf de\u011fi\u015ftirdi\u011fine ve hatta Atina\u2019n\u0131n destekledi\u011fi demok\u00adrasiden, Pers ve Spartal\u0131lar\u0131n destekledi\u011fi oligar\u015fi y\u00f6netimine kayd\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u015fahit olmaktay\u0131z. Rhodos, IV. y\u00fczy\u0131l\u0131n sonlar\u0131na do\u011fru ticari a\u00e7\u0131dan avantajl\u0131 olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnerek B\u00fcy\u00fck \u0130skender sonras\u0131 Diadokhoi krallar\u0131\u00adn\u0131n her biri ile dostluklar kurmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f ve onlar\u0131n birbirleriyle olan sava\u015flar\u0131na kat\u0131lmamaya \u00e7aba harcam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 305 y\u0131l\u0131nda Makedonya kral\u0131 I. Antigonos\u2019un o\u011flu Demetrios\u2019un \u0131srarlar\u0131na ra\u011fmen, kendi ticareti ve gelirleri a\u00e7\u0131\u00ads\u0131ndan \u00f6nemli bir yer olan M\u0131s\u0131r kral\u0131 I. Ptolemaios\u2019un saf\u0131nda yer alm\u0131\u015f ve b\u00fcy\u00fck bir ku\u015fatma sonucunda teslim olmak zorunda kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Anahtar S\u00f6zc\u00fckler:\u00a0<\/strong>Rhodos, Ticaret, Politika ve Klasik D\u00f6nem<\/p>\n

Top<\/a><\/div>\n

Abstract:\u00a0<\/strong>Rhodes, from the earlier times onwards, had continued to maintain a powerful military navy and a trading class. From a strategical point of view, she was especially at the center of grain trade extending towards the east, from the southern coasts of Anatolia to the Levantine and then to the Egypth, towards the West to the Cylades and to the the important city-states of Greece as well as towards the North, to the coastal islands and the cities of Asia Minor and finally ending with the city-states of Black Sea. This position of the island seems to have reflected itself on her welfare. During the first half of the VIIIth<\/sup> century and the last quarter of the IVth<\/sup> century when she was very strong, she held the control, security and the trade of the sea in her region. Yet, she seems to have succeeded in standing on her own during the Vth<\/sup> century BC by watching out the policy of balance among the big powers such as Athens, Sparta and Persia. Rhodes appears to have often changed sides during the IVth <\/sup>century BC by means of the support from the interior factions who collaborated with the foreign powers; she adopted the rule of democracy by the intervention and support of Athens and the rule of oligarchy by those of Persia and Sparta. Towards the end of the IVth<\/sup> century BC, having thought it useful from a commercial point of view, she strove to establish friendships with the kings of Diadochoi after the death of Alexander the Great and not to interfere in the wars among those kings. Despite this, she was obliged to make alliance with the Egyptian king Ptolemy I due to her close trade relations when Demetrius, the son of Antigonus I, insisted on making Rhodes to take side with himself. As a result of this, she was put under a heavy blockade by Demetrius and had to surrender to him in 305 BC.<\/p>\n

Keywords:\u00a0<\/strong>Rhodes, Trade, Politics and Classical Period<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/a>