{"id":2735,"date":"2018-12-30T22:10:07","date_gmt":"2018-12-30T20:10:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journal.phaselis.org\/uncategorized\/pha-0082"},"modified":"2018-12-31T00:05:05","modified_gmt":"2018-12-30T22:05:05","slug":"pha-0082","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/journal.phaselis.org\/en\/2018-en\/pha-0082","title":{"rendered":"Edebiyat\u00e7\u0131 Kimli\u011fiyle Quintus Tullius Cicero"},"content":{"rendered":"

Quintus Tullius Cicero As a Man of Letters<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Mehmet OKTAN<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

PHASELIS<\/em> IV (2018) 371-387<\/strong>
\nDOI<\/strong>: 10.18367\/Pha.18023<\/a>
\nReceived Date<\/strong>: 16.11.2018 \u00a0 | Acceptance Date<\/strong>: 12.12.2018
\nOnline Publication Date<\/strong>: 30.12.2018
\nCopyright \u00a9 PHASELIS Disiplinleraras\u0131 Akdeniz Ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar\u0131 Dergisi, 2018<\/p>\n

<\/div><\/div>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t\n

\"pdf\"\u00a0 Get PDF<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\"references\"\u00a0<\/strong> View PDF<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\"info\"<\/a>\u00a0 References<\/a><\/b><\/p>\n\n\t\t

<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>
<\/div>\n

\u00d6z:<\/strong> Quintus Tullius Cicero kendisine ilham kayna\u011f\u0131 olabilecek veya edebi a\u00e7\u0131dan geli\u015fimine katk\u0131 sa\u011flayabile\u00adcek Cicero gibi bir abiye sahiptir. Onunla birlikte iyi bir e\u011fitim ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in Yunan edebiyat\u0131 ile felsefesine \u00e7ok vak\u0131ft\u0131r ve Roma d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda 7 y\u0131l kadar idari g\u00f6revlerde bulunmas\u0131 hari\u00e7 tutulursa hayat\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7o\u011funlukla onunla ge\u00e7irmi\u015ftir. Bu durumda yaz\u0131m konusunda kendisinin de onun gibi b\u00fcy\u00fck bir yetkinli\u011fe ula\u015fmas\u0131 ve \u00e7ok \u00fcretken bir yazar olmas\u0131 beklenebilir. Nitekim Cicero\u2019dan ve di\u011fer antik yazarlardan kendisinin dikkate de\u011fer \u00f6zellikte bir \u015fair oldu\u011fu \u00f6\u011frenilmektedir. Buna kar\u015f\u0131n \u00e7o\u011funlukla Roma d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndayken yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fiirlerinin muhte\u00admelen kaybolaca\u011f\u0131na dair bir endi\u015fe ta\u015f\u0131mamas\u0131 nedeniyle, bunlar\u0131 tek n\u00fcsha olarak yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ayn\u0131 duygu yo\u011funlu\u011fuyla tekrar yazamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya \u00fcstlendi\u011fi vazifelerin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra ya\u015fanan geli\u015fmeler nedeniyle \u00fczerlerinde tekrar durma f\u0131rsat\u0131 yakalayamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in bunlar g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcze kalmam\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Bu durum \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcnl\u00fck d\u00fczeyinin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemeke birlikte, eserlerin ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fl\u0131klar bunlar\u0131n Yunanca\u2019dan Latince\u2019ye uyarlama veya \u00e7eviri oldu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesine yol a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. G\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcze tam veya bir k\u0131sm\u0131 kalan eserlerini ise, uyarlama veya \u00e7eviri olabilecek \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n da etkisiyle, ba\u015fta a\u011fabeyi olmak \u00fczere di\u011fer yazarlara atfetme e\u011filimi bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmada, mevcut eserleri ve a\u011fabeyi ile di\u011fer antik yazarlar\u0131n kendisi hakk\u0131nda ver\u00addi\u011fi bilgiler do\u011frultusunda Quintus Tullius Cicero\u2019nun edebiyat\u00e7\u0131 kimli\u011fi ele al\u0131nacakt\u0131r. Az say\u0131da edebi faali\u00adyette bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n nedenlerinin daha iyi anla\u015f\u0131labilece\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmada k\u0131sa bir \u015fekilde kendisinin hayat\u0131na da yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Anahtar S\u00f6zc\u00fckler:\u00a0<\/strong>Quintus Tullius Cicero, Marcus Tullius Cicero, Latin Edebiyat\u0131<\/p>\n

Top<\/a><\/div>\n

Abstract:\u00a0<\/strong>Quintus Tullius Cicero had an elder brother who could inspire and contribute in terms of literature to his development, being Cicero. In addition, Quintus Tullius obtained a very good education becoming a master of Greek literature and philosophy, and he spent most of his life in Rome together with him, with the exception of 7 years when he served in administrative positions outside of Rome. For that reason his writing was naturally expected to be excellent and that he would become a very productive writer. Indeed, it is known from Cicero and from other ancient writers that he was a poet of noteworthy ability. Although his poems were mostly written out of Rome, probably due to the fact he wasn\u2019t concerned that they would be lost, he wrote all his works only as single copies to his brother and he couldn\u2019t rewrite them again when they were lost so as to carry the same intensity of feeling as in the first copy. Further, through developments as well the many time consuming tasks undertaken he didn’t realise his full potential literary output. Although this situation prevents the full understanding of the level of authenticity he reached, the titles they carry indicate these works were adaptations made from Greek to Latin, or were translations. The rare examples of his work, of which some part, or, all of a work, remain to the present day, have often been attributed to other writers, especially to his older brother, in consequence of his area of study, producing works of adaptation or translation. In this study, from the surviving remains of his works and from indications of his lost works, together with the information provided by his brother and by other ancient authors, the literary identity of Quintus Tullius Cicero is examined. To better understand the relationship between his life and his works an account of his life is also included, which provides reasons why his literary output was not greater than it was.<\/p>\n

Keywords:\u00a0<\/strong>Quintus Tullius Cicero, Marcus Tullius Cicero, Latin Literature<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/a>