{"id":6339,"date":"2026-10-22T10:33:40","date_gmt":"2026-10-22T07:33:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journal.phaselis.org\/?p=6339"},"modified":"2026-10-22T10:33:40","modified_gmt":"2026-10-22T07:33:40","slug":"pha-0201","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journal.phaselis.org\/en\/2026-en\/pha-0201","title":{"rendered":"Representing Pamphylia and Lycia in Hans Rott\u2019s Kleinasiatische Denkm\u00e4ler (1908)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Hans Rott\u2019un Kleinasiatische Denkm\u00e4ler\u2019inde (1908) Pamphylia ve Lykia\u2019n\u0131n Temsili<\/p>\n

Zeynep DO\u011eANCI<\/strong>
\n\"\" https:\/\/orcid.org\/<\/a>0000-0001-9416-1558<\/a><\/sub><\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

PHASELIS<\/em> XII (2026) 199-215
\n<\/strong>DOI<\/strong>: 10.5281\/zenodo.21282119<\/a>
\nReceived Date<\/strong>: 09.06.2026 | Acceptance Date<\/strong>: 14.09.2026
\nOnline Publication Date<\/strong>: 22.10.2026<\/p>\n

<\/div><\/div>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t\n

\"pdf\"<\/a> \u00a0Get PDF<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\"references\"<\/a> <\/strong> View PDF<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\"info\"<\/a>\u00a0 References<\/a><\/b><\/p>\n\n\t\t

<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>
<\/div>\n

Abstract<\/strong>: This article examines Hans Rott’s 1908 work, Kleinasiatische Denkm\u00e4ler aus Pisidien, Pamphylien, Kappadokien und Lykien, not merely as a technical and empirical field report documenting Early Christian and Eastern Roman monuments in Pamphylia, Pisidia, Cappadocia, and Lycia, but as a text profoundly shaped by the institutional, theological, and Orientalist knowledge-production processes of late Wilhelmine Germany. Through a critical historiographical approach, the study analyzes Rott’s itinerary selection, his systematic inclusion and exclusion of specific monuments, and his narrative language. The theoretical framework draws on Mary Louise Pratt’s analysis of colonial representational practice and the “contact zone”, Suzanne Marchand’s study of German Orientalism, and Ja\u015b Elsner’s assessment of the A. Riegl & J. Strzygowski debate. Furthermore, the article examines how the Cunitz and Piper Foundations, Johannes Ficker’s guidance, and the Alsace-Lorraine context structurally shaped Rott’s research agenda. A comparison with Count Karl Lanckoro\u0144ski’s expedition demonstrates how the same geography was framed into fundamentally divergent historical narratives under varying institutional and funding networks. Ultimately, the study argues that Rott’s text should be reread not as an uncritical repository of raw data, but as a document of knowledge production that renders its underlying institutional and ideological filters visible.<\/p>\n

Keywords<\/strong>: Hans Rott, Pamphylia, Lycia, German Orientalism, Historiography of Archaeology<\/p>\n

Top<\/a><\/div>\n

\u00d6z<\/strong>: Dijital epigrafi; g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleme, \u00fc\u00e7 boyutlu belgeleme, makine \u00f6\u011frenimi ve ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k veriyi kapsamakta olup, g\u00fcncel iddialar\u0131n disiplin i\u00e7indeki yerini belirlemek ad\u0131na ele\u015ftirel bir de\u011ferlendirmeyi gerekli k\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Makale, epigrafik belgelemenin k\u00e2\u011f\u0131t estampajlardan yapay zek\u00e2 destekli ara\u00e7lara uzanan evrimini incelemekte; alan\u0131 \u015fekillendiren y\u00f6ntem ve altyap\u0131lar\u0131 tan\u0131tmaktad\u0131r. S\u0131ras\u0131yla belgeleme tarihi, RTI, SfM fotogrametrisi, multispektral ve hiperspektral g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleme, Pythia, Ithaca ve Aeneas gibi derin \u00f6\u011frenme sistemleri, dijital veri tabanlar\u0131, EpiDoc standard\u0131 ve FAIR\/IIIF\/Ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131k Veri altyap\u0131s\u0131 ele al\u0131nmakta; mevcut sorun ve eksiklikler tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Yapay zek\u00e2 epigrafi ara\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n bildirilen do\u011fruluk oranlar\u0131n\u0131 denetleyen hakemli ve ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z yineleme \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 literat\u00fcrde s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 kalmaktad\u0131r. Bu sistemler, kal\u0131pla\u015fm\u0131\u015f (form\u00fcler) ile az tan\u0131klanm\u0131\u015f yaz\u0131tlar aras\u0131nda d\u00fczensiz performans g\u00f6stermekte; uzman katk\u0131s\u0131 \u00f6zellikle ikinci grupta kritik \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r. Hesaplamal\u0131 epigrafinin Hellence ve Latince \u00fczerine yo\u011funla\u015fmas\u0131, T\u00fcrkiye’deki veriler d\u00e2hil, co\u011frafi bak\u0131mdan daha \u00e7e\u015fitli epigrafik gelenekleri ikincil konuma itmektedir. Veri taban\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclebilirli\u011fi, birlikte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fabilirlik ve FAIR uyumlulu\u011fu yinelenen yap\u0131sal sorunlard\u0131r. Yapay zek\u00e2 destekli ara\u00e7lar, hen\u00fcz do\u011frulanm\u0131\u015f metodolojik devrimler olarak de\u011fil, karar destek sistemleri olarak konumland\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Anahtar Kelimeler: <\/strong>Hans Rott, Pamphylia, Lykia, Alman Oryantalizmi, Arkeoloji Tarih Yaz\u0131m\u0131<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/a>